![mac pro 5.1 dell p2715q mac pro 5.1 dell p2715q](https://www.macinchem.org/blog/files/img_1332.jpg)
The XPS 17 is a bit larger in width, unsurprising given its 16:10 17-inch display compared to the MacBook Pro 16’s 16:10 16.2-inch panel. You won’t choose between these two excellent machines based on their looks or build quality. The fiber palm rests on the XPS 17 are more comfortable than the MacBook Pro 16’s cold metal, but that’s the only design element that stands out. Each laptop is also attractively elegant in its own way, with the MacBook Pro 16 exhibiting a more conservative, minimalist design while the XPS 17 has a sleeker, more streamlined appearance and the choice of black (carbon fiber) or white (glass fiber) keyboard decks that give it a more luxurious appearance. Both are constructed of CNC machined aluminum, both exhibit zero bending, flexing, or twisting in the lid, keyboard deck, or chassis, and both exude quality. The Dell XPS 17 and Apple Macbook Pro 16 are two of the best-designed and most well-built laptops on the market today. Notice that Apple's own 27" displays are either 1440p (108 ppi) or 5K (217 ppi).
![mac pro 5.1 dell p2715q mac pro 5.1 dell p2715q](http://mrmagicmadmax.bplaced.net/display1.jpg)
So your only option there is going to be to set macOS to use a "Scaled" setup, which is available but which causes that post-render GPU scaling to occur, in this case even if that were the only display you had connected. A 27" 4K display weighs in at 163 ppi, right in the middle of those ranges and therefore an equally bad fit with both. macOS optimizes for either standard displays (100-110 ppi) or Retina displays (200-220 ppi). Lastly, a 27" 4K display is an especially bad choice for a Mac. Notice that Apple's own 27" displays are either 1440p (108 ppi) or 5K (217 There are several problems with this setup.Ĥ. Essentially the OS is going to optimize its internal rendering for one or the other and then use post-render GPU scaling to resize that rendered output for the other display, which will cause that other display not to look as good as it could otherwise.Ĥ.
![mac pro 5.1 dell p2715q mac pro 5.1 dell p2715q](https://www.lifewire.com/thmb/Hg9Z768imuLA0XYHH8eiMCGmscw=/1500x1500/filters:no_upscale()/_hero_SQ_Dell-Ultra-HD-4K-Monitor-1-c66f4a63f44343bdbb1f94297bd8c21e.jpg)
#MAC PRO 5.1 DELL P2715Q 1080P#
Mixing displays with vastly different pixel densities, such as a 27" 4K display (163 ppi) and a 24" 1080p display (94 ppi) isn't a great idea due to how OS rendering works. And neither your system nor displays support the newer DisplayPort 1.4/HBR3 standard.ģ.
#MAC PRO 5.1 DELL P2715Q FULL#
That display will singlehandedly consume almost the full bandwidth available on a DisplayPort 1.2/HBR2 link, so you won't even have enough bandwidth left over to run a 1080p display as well, even if you were using a Windows system that supported daisy chaining in general. Even if the above weren't an issue, you have a bandwidth issue.
#MAC PRO 5.1 DELL P2715Q INSTALL#
Ironically if you install Boot Camp on a Mac to run Windows, a daisy chain works fine in that setup, so this is an OS limitation, not a hardware issue.Ģ. This has been the subject of complaint for years on this forum, Apple's forums, and elsewhere on the Internet. macOS does not support DisplayPort MST, which is required for daisy chaining. There are several problems with this setup.ġ.